- 5GW Effectors
- 5GWers
- Fivers
- 5GW Constructors
- 5GW Practitioners
- Fivetitioners
- 5GW-actors
- 5actors
- Phactor
- Fivetors
- Nutters
- Phrauds
- Phakes
- Fuppets
Any Thoughts?
Terminology Question: How should we refer to those “doing” 5GW?
Any Thoughts?
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://dreaming5gw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/171
Nutters, Phrauds, Phakes, and Fuppets: Oh my!
How about: "Those who fight 5GW-style!"
Or: "They Who Must Not Be Named!"
I can see a long comment coming up, so I'm leaving it there. ;)
If anyone is curious, I have the site jargon database which can be useful for these kinds of things. I've created a 5th Generation Warfare category, it's here
http://www.jargondatabase.com/SubCat.aspx?id=119
I've mostly focused on the organization as in 5GW organization.
I also use 5GW actors and 5GWarriors.
I kind of like Fivers and 5actors. The only problem with this is that outside of this corner of the blogoshpere nobody would have any clue what you are talking about.
I've always loved Curtis' Prawns (proxies/pawns) and I just used 5GW Starfish to describe an organization, maybe some other kind of sea life fits 5GW? How about Atlanteans. It is most likely they and their lost city don't exist, but there are people out there who insist they do (and the government is covering it up!).
Your point is well taken, that the terminology should not be to insular but recognizable to those out out little corner of the internet.
Given that, I guess I will use a combinations of: 5GW Actor, 5GW Orgs, 5GWer.
Prawn or Fuppet would have been fun - especially when typing late at night!
Well, I'm going to continue using "prawn" to describe a proxy/pawn, and StumbleUpon visitors will just have to get used to it! These, however, are not the 5GW operatives -- another term I've used. 5GWops? Er...